Skip to content

comparison of hawleys and essix retainer

POST ORTHODONTIC PERIODONTAL EVALUATION OF PATIENT WITH DIFFERENT REMOVABLE RETAINERS :-HAWLEYS Vs ESSIX

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/05/042492
Enrollment
24
Registered
2022-05-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i. Patients who have completed active orthodontic treatment. ii. Patients willing to participate in the study. iii. Orthodontic patients who are prescribed removable retainers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. Visually challenged patients. ii. Mentally challenged patients. iii. Patients with poor history of oral hygiene. iv. Patients on medication. v. Syndromic patients. vi. Surgically treated cases. vii. Cleft lip and Palate cases. viii. Patients with missing teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
STERETPTOCOCCUS MUTANS COLONY FORMATION IN BOTH THE APPLIANCE ESSIX AND HAWLEYS, PERIODONTAL STATUS OF THE SAME PATIENTS USING PERIODONTAL INDEX AND ORAL HYGIENE INDEXTimepoint: DIFFERENCES WILL BE EVALUATED BETWEEN START OF THE STUDY T0 TO T2 60 DAYS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
CARIES PROMOTING APPLIANCE, BASED ON THE COLONY FORMING UNITS IN BOTH THE APPLIANCES. ALSO THE GINGIVAL AND PERIODONTAL STATUS DURING THE STUDY PERIODTimepoint: T1-T2 FROM START OF THE STUDY TO 60 DAYS END OF THE STUDY

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSTEFFI JOHNSON

D.J COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH

priyankakumarsethi@gmail.com8743843706

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026