Skip to content

To evaluate the usefulness of a new antimicrobial wound dressing (VELVERT) for the treating infected wound in comparison Framycetin cream 1% w/w

A randomized-controlled, open label, two arm post market clinical study to evaluate safety and efficacy of a new antimicrobial wound dressing (VELVERT) compared to the standard dressing. (SD) in infected wound. - VELVERT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/05/042407
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-05-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L088- Other specified local infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Datt Mediproducts Private Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male and female of age group between 18 to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult). 2. Subjects must be able to read and understand informed consent, and sign the informed consent to provide data for the study. 3. Subjects who allow their data to be collected for the study at predefined follow-up periods. 4. Female subject that is willing to take contraceptive pills for the duration of the study, is permanently sterilized, or post-menopausal as defined by cessation of menses for at least twelve (12) months prior to enrollment. 5. Subjects suffering from infected wound with size more than 25/30 square centimeter. 6. Subjects having a traumatic infected wound with duration less than 1 month.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with the follow up visits necessary for data collection. 2. Subject found positive for HIV, HBsAg and HCV. 3. Concurrent participation in another clinical trial that involves an investigational drug or dressing that would interfere with this study. 4. Pregnant females. 5. Subject with Immunosuppression, corticosteroids or chemotherapy. 6. Subject with decision making impairment. 7. Subject with a severe comorbid disorder, not expected to survive more than 12 months. 8. Diabetic foot infections. 9. Allergies to any material contained investigational devices. 10. Subjects with burn wounds, DFU, malignant ulcers, tubercular ulcers, leprotic ulcers, gangrenous ulcers, ischemic ulcers, bed sores. 11. Any other condition which, according to the judgment of the investigator, could interfere in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of dressings and time required (in days) to achieve complete wound closure. Healing is based on Favorable healing outcome (FHO) at a time frame of 24 days. An FHO is considered to have occurred in a given patient if all the following composite endpoints are met: I.Total wound area (sum of areas of all present wounds on both limbs) has decreased, compared to baseline (Screening), by 100% at or before the scheduled last visit. II.Comparative evaluation of wounds through Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool and assessment of wound photographs at each visit. III.Evaluate bacterial load before (Day 0), Day 8, Day 16 and on the last day (Day 24). Timepoint: (Day 24).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
i. Comparative evaluation of wound infection during the study period assessed through TLC and DLC evaluation. ii. Comparative evaluation of each of the observation used to define FHO at time frame of 24 days. iii. Comparative evaluation of the number of complete wound closures. iv. Number of local cares requiring instrumental debridement (surgical or sharp debridement) in 24 days duration. v. Number of subjects reporting relive from pain Comparative evaluation of Subject pain level based on a 0-10 Numeric Pain Chart on each dressing day and its final removal (0 - no pain, 10 - worst pain imaginable). They will be instructed to share the medication name, dosage, and number of pills if they are given analgesics for pain relief. vi. Assessment of infection level. vii. Comparative evaluation of Subject for their infection level based on TLC and DLC values. Timepoint: 24 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pankaj Bablani

S.N Medical College, Agra

drsingharadhana@gmail.com9412589226

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026