FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare success and complication rate of inserting catheter in the large central vein (Subclavian) using either ultrasound or landmark guided approach in patient receiving mechanical ventilation.

Comparison of success and complication rate during Subclavian vein cannulation using ultrasound guided long-axis in-plane technique and anatomical landmark guided technique in mechanically ventilated patients: A Prospective Randomized Open Label Study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/04/042244
Enrollment
214
Registered
2022-04-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Anatomical landmark guided SCV cannulation: Finder needle with a slight continuous negative suction will be inserted 1 cm inferior and 1 cm lateral to the junction of the middle and m
the transducer will be then rotated until a longitudinal view will be obtained. This view will enable the visualization of the transition axillary to subclavian vein and the pleural line, thus enabl

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patient aged 18years old or older. 2) Belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 1-3. 3) Belonging to either sex. 4) Either scheduled for elective surgery requiring CVC or admitted in the ICU and receiving mechanical ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patient having infection at the access site. 2) Patients with coagulopathy or on anticoagulation therapy. 3) Subclavian vein could not be visualised or appear thrombosed during initial screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the first attempt success rate of SCV cannulation using the two techniquesTimepoint: During Procedure—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the overall success rate of SCV cannulation using the two technique To compare the time required for successful SCV cannulation using the two technique To compare the complications of SCV cannulation using the two techniqueTimepoint: Periprocedural—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPraveen BK

All India Institute of Medical sciences, Jodhpur

drmsadik@gmail.com9414849733

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026