Different methods for trying normal delivery

â??COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL, INTRACERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER, INTRACERVICAL DINOPROSTONE AS METHODS OF INDUCTION OF LABOUR AND MATERNAL AND FETAL OUTCOMEï¿½?

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/04/042218

Enrollment

273

Registered

2022-04-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery Health Condition 2: O618- Other failed induction of labor

Interventions

Intervention1: Foley catheter: Under aseptic precautions bishops score assessed. Foley catheter of No.18 introduced in the cervical canal. Foley catheter balloon is filled with 50 ml of normal saline.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with 1. singleton, 2. cephalic, 3. term gestation, 4. intact membranes, 5. live fetus, 6. absence of uterine contractions, 7. Informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnancy induced hypertension, 2. fetal distress, 3. previous cesarian section, 4. uterine surgery, 5. intrauterine growth reduction , 6. malpresentation , 7. oligohydramnios, 8. polyhydramnios 9. diabetic mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
rate of vaginal deliveryTimepoint: 24 hours after induction	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Rate of cesarean section Timepoint: 48 hours of induction	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Praveen Uppar

Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences Gadag

hanumantvn.1210@gmail.com9448001054

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026