Skip to content

Study to reduce side effects of obtaining bone graft from fibula in children

Effect of filling non vascularized fibular donor site with bone substitutes on regeneration and ankle valgus in children: a randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/04/042192
Enrollment
26
Registered
2022-04-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Bone substitute added to fibular donor site post harvest: In the intervention group, after the harvest of fibular graft, the donor site will be filled with bone substitute Control Inter

Sponsors

Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya Delhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients 2. The graft (unilateral or bilateral) obtained from a healthy leg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Additional procedures in the donor leg during the follow up period 2. Neuromuscular or bony pathology in the ipsilateral tibia or donor fibula 3. Preoperative radiological ankle valgus present in the donor leg: Lower distal tibial angle (LDTA) 1 or both

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Regeneration at fibular donor siteTimepoint: 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
â?¢ Radiological changes in lower distal tibial angle (LDTA) in subsequent radiographs in each group. â?¢ Radiological changes in fibular station in subsequent radiographs in each group. Timepoint: 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnil Agarwal

Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya

anilrachna@gmail.com8595919304

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026