Skip to content

Management of gum recession using two types of membranes derived from blood

Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap along with platelet rich fibrin obtained by two different centrifugation protocols in management of gingival recession -A prospective comparative clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/04/042040
Enrollment
44
Registered
2022-04-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K060- Gingival recession

Interventions

Intervention1: Group 1: Coronally advanced flap and platelet rich fibrin obtained by horizontal spin protocol: Sites with gingival recession are to be treated by coronally advanced flap and platelet r

Sponsors

Kavitha Sridhar
Lead Sponsor
Department of Periodontology
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Systemically healthy subjects with an age range of 18-65 years. 2. Individuals diagnosed with recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars (Cairo’s RT1 & RT2 class of recession) 3. Sites with minimum depth of recession =2mm. 4. Isolated or multiple adjoining recession involving =3 teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Sites with probing pocket depth =4mm. 2. Teeth with mobility and/or associated with trauma from occlusion. 3. Sites with dental caries and prosthetic restorations. 4. Patients who exhibit unacceptable oral hygiene compliance during/or after phase ? therapy. 5. Smokers. 7. Pregnant and lactating women. 8. Patients with known platelet disorders or using any medication that are known to interfere with platelet function. 9. Patients with systemic conditions or disease influencing the course of periodontal disease and therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the following parameters between the study groups 1. Recession height 2. Root coverage percentage Timepoint: Baseline 3 Months 6 Months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the following parameters between the study groups 1. Width of keratinized gingiva 2. Gingival thickness Timepoint: Baseline 6 Months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKavitha Sridhar

SRM Dental College

anupamamds@gmail.com9677065517

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026