FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparative study of Laryngoscope guided and Blind insertion techniques of Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal in Children

A Comparative study of Laryngoscope guided and Blind insertion techniques of Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal in Children

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/04/042024
Enrollment
160
Registered
2022-04-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signs

Interventions

Intervention1: Inserting of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway: In one group Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway will be inserted blindly, in other group Laryngoscope guided insertion will be there for securing

Sponsors

VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The ASA 1/2 children of either gender in the age group of 2-12 years old scheduled for surgery under General Anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with anticipated difficult airway, restricted mouth opening, recent upper respiratory tract infection, increased risk of regurgitation,aspiration, hiatus hernia, cervical spine disease, head and neck surgeries, syndromes affecting airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure.Timepoint: At 5 mins after insertion of LMA—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure, Fiberoptic Position Scoring,Ease of insertion Scoring, Heamodyanamic Parameters, any trauma, postoperative adverse eventsTimepoint: At Baseline, before insertion of PLMA,at 1,3 and 5 mins after insertion of LMA—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amit Goyat

VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital

dramitgoyat@gmail.com7988628124

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026