Skip to content

Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu laryngeal masks in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Appedicectomy under general anaesthesia

Comparison of OLP (Oropharyngeal Leal Pressure) and performance characteristics of I-GEL and Ambu Aura in patient undergoing Laparoscopic appendicectomy under general anaesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/04/041651
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-04-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Ambu Aura: Insertion of Ambu Aura after giving general anaesthesia induction agents and muscle relaxant and measure the parameters in 1 hour Control Intervention1: I-GEL: Insertion of

Sponsors

GMERS Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Age 18 years to 60 years 2) American Society of Anesthesiology grade I & II patients 3) Mouth opening >= 2.5 cm 4) Patients who are willing to participate and give consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patient who does not comply to minimum 8 hours of fasting before surgery 2) Patients with potentially difficult airway 3) Patients with active upper respiratory tract infection 4) Patients with high risk of aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the OLP (Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure) of Ambu Aura and I-gelTimepoint: OLP (Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure) of both devices will be measured at 0 mins(immediately after insertion), at 5 mins and at 15 mins and will be compared

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Airway manipulation required to maintain the airway patency will be observedTimepoint: Airway manipulation required to maintain the airway patency will be noted intraoperatively;Assessment of first attempt success rate and the number of attempts, as well as the time to insert the both SGDs and compare them. Timepoint: At the time of insertion, first attempt success rate and the number of attempts, as well as the time to insert in seconds will be noted ;Ease of SGD insertion will be subjectively assessed by the investigator on an objective scale Timepoint: Ease of SGD insertion will be subjectively assessed by the investigator on an objective scale at the time of insertion(time 0) ;Observation of complication after removal of SGDs and compare them.Timepoint: Complication if occur any will be observed immediately after removal of SGDs and in post operative period in the recovery room;Observation of obstructionTimepoint: Signs of obstruction will ne observed after insertion and also intraoperatively;Observe the ease of gastric tube insertion through gastric tube channel with 3-point scaleTimepoint: Ease of gastric tube insertion through gastric tube channel with 3-point scale immediately after insertion of SGDs

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jay Shukla

GMERS Medical college and hospital ,Gotri, Vadodara

anupchandnani29@gmail.com9925436505

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026