FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of satisfaction and regret after treatment completion of patients opting for medical management for ureteric stone to those opting for early endoscopic treatment

Decision Regret Analysis in patients opting for early URSL vs MET for symptomatic small ureteric calculi: A prospective comparative study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/03/041488
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-03-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N201- Calculus of ureter

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE MANIPAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients of symptomatic ureteric calculus less than or equal to 10mm presenting to Kasturba Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Bilateral ureteric calculi, ureteric calculus with elevated TLC, ureteric calculi with renal dysfunction, ureteric calculi with indwelling ureteral stent in-situ, incidentally diagnosed asymptomatic ureteric calculus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) score Decision Regret Score Both the above mentioned scores to be calculated at the end of treatment completionTimepoint: 4 WEEKS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To calculate the percentage of patients of opt for switching of treatment option from one to the other during the treatment courseTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactANSHUMAN SINGH

KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE, MANIPAL

urologyarun@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026