FindTrial
Sign In

To compare the two ways of IJV cannulation, namely Landmark guided versus USG guided in terms of their success rate,time for cannulation,complications rate.

A Prospective Randomized Interventional Control Study For The Comparison Of Landmark v/s USG Guided Technique For Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation In Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients at SMS Medical college, Jaipur

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/03/041480
Enrollment
190
Registered
2022-03-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I52- Other heart disorders in diseasesclassified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: USG guided IJV cannulation Technique: USG guided IJV insertion is being comapred to its Landmark guided approach Control Intervention1: Landmark guided technique for IJV insertion: Lanm

Sponsors

SMS Medical College Jaipur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All Patients scheduled for cardiothoracic surgery and requiring central venous catheter insertion Patients having ASA Grade II and III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with altered coagulation profile/neck burn contracture/cervical spine injury/superior vena cava syndrome/neck swelling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To access the success rate between the landmark approach versus USG guided approach for IJV cannulationTimepoint: Baseline (before induction)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
First attempt success rate Number of attempts taken Total cannulation time Complications rateTimepoint: Throughout the procedure—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMan Bhavan Mahajan

S.M.S Medical College, Jaipur

dr.induverma@gmail.com9413622967

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026