FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND VERSUS LANDMARK TECHNIQUE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT SPINE ANATOMY

COMPARISON OF REAL TIME ULTRASOUND ASSISTED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LANDMARK TECHNIQUE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT SPINE ANATOMY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/03/041305
Enrollment
70
Registered
2022-03-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: - Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: COMPARISON OF REAL TIME ULTRASOUND ASSISTED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LANDMARK TECHNIQUE FOR SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFICULT SPINE ANATOMY: In group B, with patient in sitting p

Sponsors

Dayanand Medical college and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: �Lumbar spine deformity: kyphosis, lordosis or scoliosis �Poorly palpable or impalpable spinous processes. �BMI � 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Refusal for spinal anaesthesia 2. Coagulopathy 3. INR > 1.5, platelet count 4. Local site infection 5. Allergy to local anaesthetic drugs 6. Patients having any contraindications to spinal anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken to identify the best intervertebral space by palpation to time taken from insertion of needle to acquisition of CSFTimepoint: 24 hrs—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the total procedure time. To compare peri-procedural pain, discomfort scores and complications if any Timepoint: 24 hrs—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactANITA

Dayanand Medical College and Hospital ludhiana

anitasarangal10@gmail.com8528014459

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026