FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of videolaryngoscope with macintosh blade for orotracheal intubation for patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia.

Comparison of efficacy of C MAC D blade with Macintosh blade for orotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/040435
Enrollment
66
Registered
2022-02-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Endotracheal Intubation: Patient would be intubated using C MAC D blade videolaryngoscope Control Intervention1: Endotracheal Intubation: Patient would be intubated using macintosh lary

Sponsors

St Johns Medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA class I and II Patients undergoing surgery under general anaethesia requiring orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with anticipated difficult airway Patients with cervical spine injury or instability Patients with musculoskeletal disorders Surgeries involving anticipated risk of aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful endotracheal intubationTimepoint: Time taken for successful glottic visualisation and time taken for successful endotracheal intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of haemodynamic response to intubationTimepoint: 0-3 minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPragya Maheshwari

St. Johns Medical College Hospital

bindu575@gmail.com9342552324

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026