Skip to content

To evaluate the usefulness of a new antimicrobial wound dressing (VELVERT) for treating diabetic foot ulcer wounds in comparison to the standard dressing (SD)

A randomized, open label, single centre, Post Market Surveillance study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new antimicrobial wound dressing (VELVERT) compared to standard dressing (SD) in the treatment of Diabetic foot ulcer. - VELVERT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/040424
Enrollment
100
Registered
2022-02-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: E139- Other specified diabetes mellituswithout complications

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Datt Mediproduct Pvt Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Adult Diabetic male and female subjects of age group between 30 to 70 years. (Both included) 2.Subjects with Diabetic foot ulcer Stage 2/3, Non- ischaemic. 3.Subjects/ LAR must be able to read and understand informed consent, and can sign the informed consent on patient’s behalf. 4.Subjects who allow their data to be collected for the study at predefined follow-up periods

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Subjects unwilling or unable to comply with the postoperative visits necessary for data collection 2.Subjects found positive for HIV and HPV 3.Concurrent participation in another clinical trial that involves an investigational drug or dressing that would interfere with this study 4.Pregnant females 5.Comorbidities which could interfere with clinical evaluations or interpretation of results 6.Subjects with known allergy to the constituents of investigational products/ device. 7.Subjects with immunosuppression, corticosteroids or chemotherapy 8.Subjects with a severe comorbid disorder, not expected to survive more than 12 months. 9.Poor adaptivity or seriously ill subjects who cannot finish the observation period. 10.Any other condition which, according to the judgment of the investigator, could interfere in the study. 11.Subject with ischemic Diabetic foot ulcer, Infected wound, Second-degree burn. 12.Subjects with diabetic foot ulcer complications. (Stage 3 and above) 13.Subjects with gangrene present on any part of the affected foot.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A favorable outcome shall be based on complete wound closure within a time frame of 4 weeks. A favorable outcome is considered to have occurred in a given patient if all the following composite endpoints are met: 1.To obtain wound closure status on day 28 or earlier. 2.Evaluation of time taken for wound closure assessed through Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool and wound photographs at each visit. 3.Evaluate bacterial load before (Day 0) and on the last day (Day 28) Timepoint: 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 Comparative evaluation VELVERT vs Standard dressing in number of days for a complete wound closure by 4 weeks 2 Number of subjects reporting relief from pain Comparative evaluation of subjects will record their subjective pain level on 0 to 10 Numeric Pain Chart on day of dressing and its final removal 0 for no pain 10 for worst pain imaginable They will be instructed to share the medication name dosage and number of pills if they are given analgesics for pain relief 3 Number of adverse events and wound complications either due to dressing material or other causes 4 Assessment of TLC and DLC values 5 Assessment of Swab test of the wound site 6 Number of dressings required to achieve complete wound closure Timepoint: 4 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pankaj Bablani

Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences

drgyanchandpgi@gmail.com9451546353

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026