FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of effect of two methods of extraction of impacted third molar teeth

Comparison of the clinical effect of the extraction of low horizontally impacted mandibular third molars by three piece tooth sectioning method with that of conventional method

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/040323
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-02-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K011- Impacted teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: THREE PIECE TOOTH SECTIONING METHOD: A METHOD OF TOOTH SECTIONING FOR EXTRACTION OF HORIZONTALLY IMPACTED THIRD MOLARS Duration: same day Control Intervention1: CONVENTIONAL METHOD OF

Sponsors

Dr Vineeth John
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PATIENTS WITH HORIZONTALLY AND BUCCALLY IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLARS WHO WANT THESE TEETH EXTRACTED

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES 2. SIGN OF LOCAL INFLAMMATION OR PAIN ONE WEEK BEFORE PROCEDURE 3.RECENT USE OF ANTIBIOTICS 4. PARTICIPANTS WHO ARE NOT WILLING TO GIVE CONSENT FORM

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of the Treatment MethodsTimepoint: baseline , at end of procedure—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
POSTOPERATIVE PAINTimepoint: FROM THE TIME OF TREATMENT TILL THIRD POSTOPERATIVE DAY;POSTOPERATIVE SWELLINGTimepoint: FROM THE TIME OF TREATMENT TILL THIRD POSTOPERATIVE DAY;POSTOPERATIVE TRISMUSTimepoint: FROM THE TIME OF TREATMENT TILL THIRD POSTOPERATIVE DAY—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr S Mohan

GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGE KOTTAYAM

Mohanminaram@yahoo.com9847359945

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026