Skip to content

Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal as airway management in anaesthetized paralyzed patients

Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal in anaesthetized paralyzed patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/040280
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-02-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: N813- Complete uterovaginal prolapse Health Condition 3: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system Health Condition 4: C509- Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified site Health Condition 5: N838- Other noninflammatory disorders ofovary, fallopian tube and broad ligament Health Condition 6: H188- Other specified disorders of cornea Health Condition 7: H748- Other specified disorders of middle ear and mastoid

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA Protector in anaesthetized paralyzed patients: clinical performance of LMA Protector in anaesthetized paralyzed patients Control Intervention1: LMA Proseal in anaesthetized paralyze

Sponsors

Nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA- I to III undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with airway management using supraglottic airway device in supine position.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known difficult airway, edentulous, BMI > 30 kg/ m2, upper airway pathology, mouth opening upper respiratory tract infection and patient refusal to participate, will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA ProsealTimepoint: 0mins,30mins, 60mins, 90mins, 120mins, 150mins,180mins, 24hr

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Insertion characteristics (number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion, success rate, amount of air required for cuff inflation) 2. Positioning outcomes (fiberoptic view scoring, gastric tube placement) 3. Hemodynamic parameters 4. Postoperative complications (blood stains on device, sore throat, hoarseness of voice, dysphagia)Timepoint: 0mins,30mins, 60mins, 90mins, 120mins, 150mins,180mins, 24hr

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSunny

Pt. BDS University of Health Sciences

drmamta@gmail.com9812789476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026