Skip to content

A study to see which of the two different techniques to get better tissue while doing a biopsy of gastrointestinal and pancreatic lesions while doing it under endoscopic ultrasound guidance.

A comparative study to assess tissue adequacy of wet suction versus slow-pull technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in solid lesions.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/040100
Enrollment
75
Registered
2022-02-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system

Interventions

Intervention1: Wet Suction technique: In this method, once the stylet is removed, the needle will be flushed with 5 mL of saline replacing the air column. A 10-mL suction syringe with 3 ml of saline i

Sponsors

Dr Rajneesh Thakur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. age >18 years, 2. solid pancreatic or extra pancreatic lesions on imaging requiring tissue acquisition, 3. lesions which could be visualized with EUS, 4. lesion should be technically feasible for needle puncture, 5. Informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Age 2. cystic lesions of pancreas, 3. inaccessible or non-visualizable lesions at EUS, 4. international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5, 5. platelet count of 6. unstable clinical conditions or any contraindication for EUS. 7. Inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
degree of histological adequacy in patients with solid lesions who underwent EUS-FNB using the 20/22 Gauge needle with the conventional stylet slow-pull or the wet aspiration techniques.Timepoint: 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Technical success, 2. Specimen adequacy 3. Blood contamination of specimens, 4. Comparison of the two techniques in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, 5. Final pathological diagnosis. Timepoint: over 1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jayanta Samanta

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in9855319529

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026