FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative evaluation of prosthetic and biological outcome of two different implant restorative materials

A comparative evaluation of prosthetic and biological outcome as influenced by two different implant restorative materials (porcelain fused to metal and monolithic zirconia) - A prospective, cross arch study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/039915
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-02-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K055- Other periodontal diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: Implant supported fixed dental prosthesis: Intervention of two different type of implant supported fixed dental prosthesis- Porcelain fused to metal and monolithic zirconia. Control Int

Sponsors

Taniya Malhotra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Two implants placed in the same arch in posterior quadrant requiring prosthodontic rehabilitation. 2.Interocclusal restorative space of 8-10 mm 3.Healthy Periodontium with no visible signs of bruxism 4.Stable and healthy implants with no crestal bone loss

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. According to ASA Classification Class 4 patients: Organic heart disease with marked signs of cardiac insufficiency Recent myocardial infarction of less than 6 months duration. Unstable angina. Patients with advanced degrees of pulmonary, renal or endocrine insufficiency 2. According to ASA Classification Class 3 patients Diabetes with complications to vascular or other organs, i.e., retinopathy, neuropathy, etc. 3. Occlusal anomalies Deep Bite Cross Bite 4. Long term edentulism leading to mesial drifting of adjacent teeth or supraaeruption of opposing teeth 5. Para-functional Habits (Bruxism) 6. Smokers 7. Active periodontal disease 8. Allergy to materials used in the study 9. Current drug abuse 10. Pregnant or intend to become pregnant. 11. Severe salivary gland dysfunction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
primary outcome will determine which restoration will be more suitable for implant supported prosthesis. The suitabilty of the restorations will depend on the prosthetic and biologic outcome which will include ceramic fracture, screw loosening, marginal fit, color match, occlusal wear, bleeding on probing, plaque deposition etcTimepoint: primary outcome will determined at baseline, 6 months and 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Determine the biological outcome through evaluation of inflammatory markers of two different implant restorative materials. The inflammatory marker to be evaluated is MMP-8.Timepoint: Biological outcome will be assessed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBhupender Yadav

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental sciences, SGT University

drbhupinderyadav@gmail.com8743019484

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026