Skip to content

COMPARISON OF NEW SOLUTION (PLASMA ACTIVATED WATER) WITH STANDARD SOLUTION TO DETERMINE ITS ANTIMICROBIAL EFFICACY IN ROOT CANAL OF TEETH

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE WITH PLASMA ACTIVATED WATER AS IRRIGANT FOR PULPECTOMY OF PRIMARY TEETH â?? A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/02/039910
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-02-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Plasma Activated Water: To check antibacterial efficacy of plasma activated water by using it as irrigating solution during root canal treatment of primary teeth (pulpectomy) Control In

Sponsors

Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients requiring Pulpectomy in 2 teeth. Teeth with intact roots or more than 2/3rd of root present.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Teeth with excessive root resorption and mobility 2) Children with special health care conditions 3) Children who have taken antibiotic medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PAW has antimicrobial efficacy when used as an irrigating solution in root canals of primary teethTimepoint: 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
PAW has root canal cleaning efficiencyTimepoint: 1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Heli Shah

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, NPDCH, Sankalchand Patel University

vshobaf@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026