comparison of core strengthening versus conventional exercise on physiotherapist with postural changes

comparison of pressure biofeedback and core stabilization exercise versus conventional protocol on physiotherapists with lower crossed syndrome

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2022/01/039763

Enrollment

Registered

2022-01-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R293- Abnormal posture

Interventions

Intervention1: Pressure biofeedback and core stabilization: pressure biofeedback and core stabilization exercise will be given for 6 session 2 weeks Control Intervention1: Conventional protocol: Con

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Working physiotherapist with lower crossed syndrome 2. Age between 20-40 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Disc pathology and radicular pain 2. History of spinal fracture or spinal surgery 3. Any systemic disease or TB of spine

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pressure biofeedback for assessing abdominal muscle strength & Gluteus maximus strength Flexible curve ruler for assessing lumbar lordosis Pelvic inclinometer for assessing pelvic tilt Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) for low back pain Goniometer for ROM of iliopsoasTimepoint: outcome measure will be taken on first day and last day of 2 weeks 6 session protocol	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: Nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactYashika Patel

Dr Balabhai Nanavati hospital

physiosangeeta@gmail.com9820745321

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026