FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two regional anaesthesia modalities for pain relief in kidney stone surgeries

A prospective double-blinded randomised trial to compare the analgesic effect of the retrolaminar block and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/01/039589
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-01-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N200- Calculus of kidney Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Erector Spinae Plane Block: USG guided ESPB Intervention2: Retrolaminar Block: USB Guided RLB Intervention3: Erector Spinae Plane Block: USG Guided Erector Spinae plane block with local

Sponsors

AIIMS Raipur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18years and above, undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for unilateral Renal Stones under General + Regional Anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients undergoing bilateral renal stone surgery, less than 18 years of age, having chronic pain

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the total analgesic requirement between the two groups (ESPB & RLB).Timepoint: 24 hours post-operatively—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the post-operative analgesia between ESPB & RLB, in patients undergoing PCNL under GARATimepoint: 4,8,12,16,20 and 24 hours post operatively—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPrateek Arora

All Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur

drsamar0002@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026