FindTrial
Sign In

A clinical trial to compare the speed of canine movement using two different methods to accelerate tooth movement

Comparison of effectiveness of piezocision aided canine retraction with and without periodic activation using micro-osteoperforation assessed by CBCT ââ?¬â?? A randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/01/039275
Enrollment
25
Registered
2022-01-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro-osteoperforation at piezocision site: Micro-osteoperforation (x3 nos., 5mm depth into the bone, 2mm distance vertically above each perforation) placed on one Piezocision site at t

Sponsors

Dr Seerab Husain
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient aged 15-35 years Patients requiring extraction of upper first premolar Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment using MBT prescription brackets

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients Patients under NSAIDs that would hinder orthodontic tooth movement. Patients with severe crowding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of canine retractionTimepoint: T0- Baseline T1- 1 month T2- 2 months T3- 3 months T4- 4 months T5- 5 months T6- 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Buccoalveolar bone thickness near piezocision and MOP siteTimepoint: 6 months;Canine AngulationTimepoint: 6 months;Implant MigrationTimepoint: 6 months;Molar Anchor LossTimepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSeerab Husain

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, SIMATS

shanthakkss@gmail.com9444443640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026