FindTrial
Sign In

A CLINICAL TRIAL TO STUDY THE EFFICACY OF TWO BLOCKS FOR LUMBAR DISECTOMY SURGERIES

“COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK VERSUS ULTRASOUND-GUIDED THORACOLUMBAR INTERFASCIAL PLANE BLOCK FOR PERIOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN LUMBAR DISCECTOMY SURGERIES ? - UGESBVUGTIPB

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/01/039249
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-01-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Erector spinal block: USG guided erector spinae block will be performed at the level of third lumbar vertebra with 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with dexmeditomedine 1mcg/kg Control Interven

Sponsors

IMS BHU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1,2 Cases of prolapsed intervertebral disc(PIVD) undergoing disectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient’s age 50 years. Patients with Bleeding diasthesis. Patient allergic to LA agents. Patients with Psychiatric disorders. Presence of infection at the injection area. Patients with H/O previous spine surgeries. Refusal of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analogue scaleTimepoint: 30 minutes,hours 1,6,12,24—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total rescue analgesia requirement in 24 hoursTimepoint: 24 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR ABHINAY JAYANTI

Institute of medical sciences

bhuapsingh@gmail.com9839412975

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026