Skip to content

Clinical trial two see the movement of teeth using two different brackets

Comparative evaluation of alignment efficiency and arch development in two passive self ligating bracket systems

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2022/01/039148
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-01-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K009- Disorder of tooth development, unspecified Health Condition 2: K009- Disorder of tooth development, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Passive self ligating AO bracket: Intervention group bonded with passive self ligating American Orthodontic brackets from premolar to premolar in both upper and lower arches and 1st and

Sponsors

Anjali Anna Thomas
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients within the age group of 15-30 years with mild to moderate crowding of the anteriors requiring fixed orthodontic treatment without extraction protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients Patients with spacing in the dentition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of decrowdingTimepoint: 8th week , 12 week, end of leveling aligning

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
rate of decrowding, maxillary arch width and incisor inclination change.Timepoint: pre treatment and towards the end of the treatment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHarish Babu

Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals

harish.ortho@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026