Comparitive Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Novel Pinhole Surgical Technique and Conventional Coronally Advanced Flap for Millerâ??s class 1 and 2 Gingival Recession Management- A Randomised Controlled Trial

Comparison of Novel Pinhole Surgical Technique with Conventional Coronally Displaced Flap for Millerâ??s class 1 and 2 Gingival Recession Management- A randomised controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/12/038830

Enrollment

Registered

2021-12-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K056- Periodontal disease, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Novel pinhole Surgical technique: Minimally invasive technique, frequency - once Surgical site - 1 Duration- 30 min Control Intervention1: Coronally advanced flap: Convention technique

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy individuals without any systemic illness having millerâ??s class 1 or 2 gingival recession

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemically Iâ??ll patients, chronic smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mean root coverage, recession reduction.Timepoint: 1 week, 1 month,3 months, 6 months.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
CAL,PD,width of KT,height of KT, percentage of root coverage, pain,root sensitivity,discomfort,aesthetics,Timepoint: 1 week, 1 month,3 months, 6 months.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBhavana Garapati

Saveetha Dental College,Saveetha University

sheejavarghese@saveetha.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026