Skip to content

A clinical study to evaluate the difference between weight based criteria and cricoid-mental distance based criteria for LMA proseal size selection in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Comparative evaluation of Cricoid Mental distance based and weight based criteria for Proseal LMA size selection in Adult patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/12/038728
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Weight based criteria for Proseal LMA size selection: Using conventional weight based criteria for LMA proseal size selection I.e size 3 for weight 30-50 kg, size 4 for weight 5

Sponsors

Maulana Azad medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -ASA grade I, II -Aged 18 to 60 years -body mass index (BMI) 18 - 30kg/m2 Expected duration of surgery less than 3 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patients with high risk of regurgitation or aspiration -Patients with an anticipated difficult airway (including but not limited to a history of difficulty airway, mouth opening -Known respiratory tract pathology -Planned surgery in lateral / prone position -Patients requiring endotracheal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Insertion success at first attempt Timepoint: From baseline to time of insertion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Attempts at Proseal insertionTimepoint: 1st attempt, 2 nd attempt, 3rd attempt. ;Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) Timepoint: During monitoring of patient once the proseal LMA is in situ. ;Time to successful insertionTimepoint: the interval beginning with picking up the airway device and ending when a successful airway device placement;Ease of insertionTimepoint: graded from 1 to 4 (1 for no resistance, 2 for mild resistance, 3 for moderate resistance, 4 for unable to placement) by the operator who performed the insertion

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKavita Rani Sharma

Maulana Azad Medical College

drkavitadn@gmail.com9968604376

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026