Skip to content

Outcome of lubricating drug injection into the knee joint after arthroscopic ligament reconstruction

Role of Intra-articular administration of Sodium Hyaluronate on Early recovery following ACL reconstruction-A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/12/038715
Enrollment
90
Registered
2021-12-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M235- Chronic instability of knee

Interventions

Intervention1: Hyaluronic acid: Group 1 (treatment group): this treatment group will receive intraarticular hyaluronic acid on day 2 and normal saline at 8th week Group 2 (treatment group): this trea

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with symptomatic ACL tear willing to undergo ACLR 2. Age: 18-50 years 3. No associated osteochondral injury 4. Patients requiring partial meniscectomy will be included 5. There should not be axial malalignment in index length 6. Contralateral knee should be healthy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. other ligament injury/ multi ligamentous injury 2. Severe meniscal injury requiring complete meniscectomy 3. Associated chondral defect requiring repair 4. Knee osteoarthritis 5. H/o associated knee joint fracture 6. Inflammatory, infective and metabolic conditions of the knee 7. Patients with chronic diseases of the heart, liver, kidney or major organ Associated dysfunction 8. H/o autoimmune illness, hematopoietic disease or bone tumor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the percentage of patients in each group (HA vs. placebo) who achieved clinically effective Lysholm score (83% Lysholm score) and able to join back their preinjury activity level (same or increased Tegner activity score) at the end of 3, 6 and 12 months.Timepoint: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a. To determine the median recovery time to achieve the Lysholm score of 83% in all groups / same or increased Tegner level compared to preinjury value b. To assess the level of activity of the patients in each group by dividing them into quick (able to run or jog, score 4 or 5) or delayed recovery (score 1-3, hard to walk, walking and stair climbing). c. To compare the pain (VAS score), function (single hop test, range of motion, knee circumference, IKDC score, Lysholm score, Tegner score) and quality of life (EQ-5D) between the groups. d. To look for synovial (IL1-beta, TNF-alfa and IL-6) and blood inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP) change with time in the groups e. To look for adverse reaction to the drug (HA). Timepoint: 6 months, 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Raghavendra

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

sujitortho@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in9438884155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026