FindTrial
Sign In

To Compare Between Two Supraglottic Airway Devices in Anaesthetised, Paralysed Patients

Comparative Evaluation Of Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal In Anaesthetised, Paralysed Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/12/038687
Enrollment
250
Registered
2021-12-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA Protector: Second generation supraglottic airway device. Using sizes
3,4,5 in patients weighing 30-50kg,50-70kg,70-100kg respectively Duration
2 hours Control Intervention1: LMA Proseal: Second generation supraglottic airway device,Using sizes 3,4,5 in patient weighing 30-50kg,50-70kg,70-100kg respectively Duration
2 hours

Sponsors

Maulana Azad Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Age 18 to 65 years of either sex. 2) American Society Of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) Class 1 and 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients at increased Risk of Aspiration or GERD. 2) BMI >35kg/m2 3) Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Insertion TimeTimepoint: At Baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Number of attempts 2.Ease of gastric tube placement 3View on FibreopticTimepoint: At Baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR Garima Bhatt

Maulana Azad Medical College New Delhi

kirtinath@gmail.com8383898343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026