FindTrial
Sign In

Effectiveness of T-PRF and DFDBA in socket preservation for implant placement.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of titanium-prepared platelet rich fibrin (T-PRF) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in socket preservation followed by implant placement using two stage approach.â??

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/12/038608
Enrollment
12
Registered
2021-12-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Atraumatic extraction followed by ridge preservation. Implant placement after 3 months: Ridge preservation using DFDBA+T-PRF Intraoral placement of T-PRF and DFDBA into extraction socke

Sponsors

Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criterias: 1. Tooth indicated for extraction. Reasons might be any one like, fracture of root, failure of endodontic treatment, resorption (internal and external), over-retained primary teeth, non-restorable carious lesions, residual roots. 2. Oral hygiene indicated with plaque score 3. Presence of opposing natural tooth. 4. Presence of adjacent teeth. 5. Thick gingival biotype. 6. Radiographic and clinical appearance of intact alveolar bony walls. 7. 4 mm of bone radiographically at root apex 8. D-1, D-2 or D-3 bone quality.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criterias: 1. Patients with impaired systemic health that would interfere with the process involved with repair and healing of bones e.g. (Diabetes mellitus, Osteoporosis, Blood disorders, and Titanium allergy). 2. Significant differences in maxilla-mandibular space. 3. Presence of para functional habits such as bruxism or clenching. 4. Presence of proclined teeth, teeth with interdental spacing, rotated or mal-aligned anterior teeth. 5. History of alcoholism, excessive smoking or drug abuse. 6. D-4 bone quality. 7. Width of keratinized gingiva less than 2mm at implant site. 8. Debilitating tempro-mandibular joint pathosis. 9. Untreated dental diseases. 10. Pregnant and lactating mothers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To evaluate bucco-lingual changes of sockets before and after ridge preservation. 2. To evaluate vertical and horizontal crestal bone changes around post extraction implant placement. 3. To evaluate success rate of delayed implant placement in ridge preservation / socket preservation. Timepoint: To be evaluated after 3 months of ridge preservation and then after 3 months of implant placement—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ranu Oza

Professor and Head, Sharad Pawar Dental College

drprasaddhadse@gmail.com09822689401

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026