BUFFERED LOCAL ANAESTHESIA VERSUS NON BUFFERED LOCAL ANAESTHESIA IN MINOR ORAL SURGERY

Effect of Buffered local anaesthesia in Minor Oral Surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/11/038274

Enrollment

100

Registered

2021-11-26

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:80,000 adrenaline: 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:80,000 adrenaline inflitration given on the buccal and palatal side of the tooth to be extracted

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients with bilateral grossly decayed maxillary molars, indicated for extraction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: subjects taking any medication such as analgesics that may alter anaesthetic assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
pain measured using visual analog scaleTimepoint: 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min, 5 min, 6 min	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
onset of local anaesthesia measured from the time of infiltration to the time the patient perceived no pain in minutesTimepoint: 30 seconds, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min, 5 min	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSRUJANA TANGELLA

Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences

drgharshaomfs@gmail.com9848389869

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026