changes in corrected position of teeth following braces treatment

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SHORT TERM RELAPSE FOLLOWING ORTHODONTIC SPACE CLOSURE WITH & WITHOUT FIBEROTOMY INTERVENTION Ã¢â?¬â?? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/11/037851

Enrollment

Registered

2021-11-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: CIRCUMFERENTIAL SUPRACRESTAL FIBROTOMY: FIBROTOMY PROCEDURE IS DONE TO DETERMINE THE RELAPSE POTENTIAL Intervention2: circumferential supracrestal fiberotomy: to remove the supcrestal f

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The study involves completely corrected malocclusion cases which underwent extraction. 2. The cases with class I molar and canine relationship , correct crown angulation, crown inclination and tight contacts.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The cases with spacing, rotation, teeth out of arch, increased overjet and overbite. 2. Patients with oral habits. 3. The cases with poor periodontal health and gingival recession.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
to comapare relapse potential with and without fiberotomy interventionTimepoint: 3 time points first will be during debonding second will be after 3 months of debonding third will be after 6 months of debonding	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
to evaulate the rate of relapse with and without fiberotomyTimepoint: after 6 months of debonding	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr PAVITHRANAND

INDIRA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF DENATAL SCIENCES

pavithranandammayappan@igids.ac.in9443183590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026