The Comparison of i-view and king vision video laryngoscope device used to put endotracheal tube in windpipe (trachea) to give anesthesia for surgery.

A Comparative evaluation of i-view video laryngoscope and King vision video laryngoscope as an intubation device in patients undergoing elective surgery.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/11/037836

Enrollment

Registered

2021-11-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis Health Condition 3: X- New Technology

Interventions

Intervention1: Iview video laryngoscope: New Video laryngoscope for intubation

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Written and informed consent 2.ASA I &II patients of either sex 3.All Mallampatti grades 4. Age between 20-60 years 5.Weight between 45-70 kg 6.Patients planned for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Previous history of multiple/failed intubation 2.Head and neck surgery 3.Valvular heart disease,CAD,uncontrolled hypertension 4.Presence of raised intracranial pressure, cervical spine injury. 5.Any pathology of the oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device 6.Mouth opening 7.Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of oesophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the laryngoscopy & intubation time in seconds using the two devicesTimepoint: The hemodynamic response at 1,3,5,10 minutes were recorded	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices. 2.To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. 3.To compare the hemodynamic response i.e., heart rate and mean arterial B.P (MABP) after laryngoscopy and intubationTimepoint: Heart rate shall be recorded from pulse-oximeter& MABP is to be recorded using non-invasive blood pressure measuring instrument. Immediate pre-induction value shall be recorded & considered as Control/baseline value. Thereafter, HR & MABP is to be recorded immediately after laryngoscopy & intubation & 3, 5 & 10 min later.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.To grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices. 2.To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. 3.To compare the hemodynamic response i.e., heart rate and mean arterial B.P (MABP) after laryngoscopy and intubationTimepoint: Heart rate shall be recorded from pulse-oximeter& MABP is to be recorded using non-invasive blood pressure measuring instrument. Immediate pre-induction value shall be recorded & considered as Control/baseline value. Thereafter, HR & MABP is to be recorded immediately after laryngoscopy & intubation & 3, 5 & 10 min later.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSYED ZAFER HASHMI

DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE, JNMCH, AMU,ALIGARH

syedkamranhabib@gmail.com9897172780

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026