FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two techniques of anaesthesia.

A comparison of Glidescope and KingsVision guided endotracheal intubation in patients with simulated difficult airway- A randomised control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/11/037712
Enrollment
84
Registered
2021-11-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Kingsvision video laryngoscope.: It is a video laryngoscope system duration for 10 sec to 10 minutes Control Intervention1: Glidescope video laryngoscope.: It is a video laryngoscope sy

Sponsors

Rohilkhand medical college and hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.American society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade I or II 2.Between 18-60 years of either sex 11,12 3.Posted for elective surgery of different specialties

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Anticipated difficult airway- Mallampatti grade >= III , Thyromental distance 2.Emergency surgery. 3.Full stomach. 4.Cardiovascular diseases and uncontrolled hypertension. 5.High intra cranial pressure (ICP).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of intubationTimepoint: From time of intubation till 12 hours .—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative sore throat.Timepoint: From time of intubation till 24 hrs .—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Neeharika arora

Rohilkhand medical college and hospital.

docneehars@gmail.com7888751369

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026