new tooth extraction instrument

COMPARISON ON THE EFFICACY OF PHYSICS FORCEPS V/S CONVENTIONAL FORCEPS IN EXTRACTION OF THIRD MOLARS â?? A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/10/037689

Enrollment

Registered

2021-10-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K006- Disturbances in tooth eruption

Interventions

Intervention1: PHYSICS FORCEPS: ATRAUMATIC EXTRACTION USING PHYSICS FORCEPS Intervention2: FORCEPS: EXTRACTION OF 3RD MOLARS USING PHYSICS AND CONVENTIONAL FORCEPS Control Intervention1: MAXIPLA SURGI

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects of both genders â?? needed for third molar extraction Above 21 years of age. Patients in good health and not taking any Anti-microbials and medications that alters pain perceptions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients. infected root stumps and tooth indicated for surgical removal. Mentally challenged patients. Periodontally weak tooth ( grade 2 & grade 3 mobility ).

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
NEWER TECHNIQUE FOR ATRAUMATIC EXTRACTIONTimepoint: 2 -15mins	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
EASY EXTRACTION AND ATRAUMATIC TOOTH EXTRACTIONTimepoint: 1 week	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactARAVINDANN

INDIRA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

adithyarajam@gmail.com9894027921

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026