FindTrial
Sign In

TO KNOW WHICH HAS BETTER OUTCOME AMONG POLYVINYL CHLORIDE AND FLEXOMETALLIC ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE INSERTION THROUGH I-GEL

OUTCOME OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE VERSUS FLEXOMETALLIC ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE INSERTION THROUGH I-GEL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037646
Enrollment
92
Registered
2021-10-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M02- Postinfective and reactive arthropathies Health Condition 2: M843- Stress fracture Health Condition 3: N631- Unspecified lump in the right breast

Interventions

Intervention1: Poly vinyl chloride Endotracheal tube insertion using i-gel as conduit.: Group- p will be inserted with appropriate size polyvinylchloride endotracheal tube using i-gel as conduit after

Sponsors

VSS Institute of Medical science and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA GRADE1and2, mallampati class 1and 2, weight-40-70 kgs, pt undergoing elective surgery under GA requiring ENDOTRACHEAL intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with anticipated difficult airway, mallampati grade 3and 4, obese patients, mouth opening <3 cm, patient with increased risk of muscle relaxant, contraindicated to use of muscle relaxant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
For ENDOTRACHEAL intubation using I-gel as conduit, poly vinyl chloride is better than FLEXOMETALLIC in terms of efficacy, first attempt success rate and time taken for insertion.Timepoint: 2years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of insertionTimepoint: 2 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPradipta kumar Patel

VSS INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH

preetijena906@gmail.com768017

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026