FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different Methods of impression making for patients with complete loss of teeth

Evaluation of Two Different Methods of Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty Application for Border Moulding in the Edentulous- A Randomised Clinical Crossover Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037620
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-10-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K081- Complete loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Border molding: Novel technique of Border molding carried out in patient. Intervention2: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Border moulding: Traditional border moulding is compared.

Sponsors

Dr Prasanna Vadhani
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches. 2. Type A and B maxillary Ridges (American college of Prosthodontists classification). 3. Type I and II mandibular ridges (American college of Prosthodontists classification). 4. Completely healed ridges with firm and resilient mucosa. 5. Class I and Class II soft palate anatomy 6. Adequate inter-arch space. 7. Class I jaw relationship

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ACP Type C and D maxillary ridges (American college of Prosthodontists classification). 2. ACP Type III and IV mandibular ridges (American college of Prosthodontists classification). 3. Pain or inflammation in the denture bearing area. 4. Flabby and hyperplasic tissues. 5. Ridges with unfavourable undercuts. 6. Class III soft palate anatomy 7. Class II and Class III jaw relationships 8. Poor neuromuscular control, sub-mucous fibrosis, Temporomandibular joint disorders, etc 9. Patients with systemic diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Efficacy of Border Molding 2. Patient SatisfactionTimepoint: 1. On the day of procedure 2. 4 weeks post insertion—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for border moldingTimepoint: On the day of procedure—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPrasanna Vadhani

Faculty of dental sciences, Ramaiah University of applied sciences

ravishankar.pr.ds@msruas.ac.in09886056303

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026