Clinical study to compare the accuracy of digital and existing manual technique in making of artificial root supported teeth

A comparison of accuracy of fit, patient comfort and time-efficiency of digital and conventional impression techniques in the fabrication of implant supported fixed prosthesis- a clinical study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/10/037582

Enrollment

Registered

2021-10-26

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: 1. Single tooth fixed implant prosthesis in posterior region of maxilla or mandible: Patient coming to department of prosthodontics for replacement of single missing tooth in posterior

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient coming to department of prosthodontics for replacement of single missing tooth in posterior regeon of maxilla or mandible, and willing to participate in the study are selected. Two Implant supported prosthesis are fabricated using digital and conventional impression techniques. Evaluation and comparison of accuracy of fit, patient comfort and time efficiency of both teccniques will be performed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients developing systemic diseases during the course of the study. 2. Patients becoming pregnant during the course of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the accuracy of fit, time- efficiency and patient comfort of implant supported prosthesis fabricated by using direct intraoral scanning and conventional impression technique.Timepoint: time- efficiency and patient comfort of digital and conventional impression technique are assessed during 2nd week of prosthetic phase. the accuracy of fit of implant supported prosthesis fabricated by using direct intraoral scanning and conventional impression technique assessed during 3rd week.	—

Measure

Time frame

the accuracy of fit, time- efficiency and patient comfort of implant supported prosthesis fabricated by using direct intraoral scanning and conventional impression technique.Timepoint: time- efficiency and patient comfort of digital and conventional impression technique are assessed during 2nd week of prosthetic phase. the accuracy of fit of implant supported prosthesis fabricated by using direct intraoral scanning and conventional impression technique assessed during 3rd week.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Namitha C Manoharan

Govt. Dental College Kozhikode (Calicut)

drvinnitk@gmail.com9495969055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026