Health Condition 1: O619- Failed induction of labor, unspecified
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: induction of labour: 42 patients are taken in each group and studied by inducing them with sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel.
Control Intervention1: SUBLINGUAL M
Sponsors
Shri BM Patil Medical College
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Singleton pregnancy 2. Cephalic presentation 3. BISHOP SCORE 4. Post maturity 5. FGR 6. Oligohydromnios and polyhydromnios 7. Rh isoimmunization 8. Premature rupture of membranes 9. IUD
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Absolute contracted pelvis and cephalopelvic disproportion 2. Pre Existing Cardiac Disorders 3. Malpresentation (breech,transverse,oblique lie) 4. Previous lscs or hysterotomy 5. Vasa previa,placenta previa 6. Acute genital herpes. 7. umbilical cord prolapse
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| THE MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES RECORDED ARE:INDUCTION TO ACTIVE LABOUR INTERVAL BISHOPS SCORE 1. On admission: 2. After induction: AUGMENTATION WITH OXYTOCIN OR ARM INDUCTION TO DELIVERY INTERVAL COLOR OF LIQOUR . MODE OF DELIVERY: â?¢ Vaginal delivery: â?¢ Instrumental delivery: â?¢ LSCS: Indication: 9.PERINATAL OUTCOME: â?¢ Mother side: â?¢ NICU: â?¢ Mortality Timepoint: 4hrs,6hrs,12hrs. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To Evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol vs intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labour Timepoint: neonatal outcome after 24hours | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDrPAVAN KUMAR POLISETTY
BLDE HOSPITAL
Outcome results
None listed