FindTrial
Sign In

comparission between inhalational and intravenous anaesthetic agent for insertion of supraglottic airways in children

â??Study of comparision between Sevoflurane versus Propofol for insertion of I - Gel in ASA grade I and II paediatric patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia.â??

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037488
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-10-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia induction agents: Comparision of two anaesthesia induction agents, propofol and sevoflurane for insertion of I-gel in paediatric patients for mi

Sponsors

Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Reaesrch
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient with both sexes with age between 4-12 years 2. ASA I and II physical status. 3. Patient undergoing elective minor surgical procedures below umbilicus lasting less than60 minutes. 4. No anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati Grade I or II)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients at risk of aspiration â?? upper GI surgery, gastroesophageal disease, not fasted. 2. Patients with oropharyngeal pathology 3. Patients who require high positive pressure ventilation â?? eg. Pulmonary fibrosis. 4. Patients with cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal disease 5. Hypersensitivity to halogenated anaesthetic agents or propofol. 6. ASA III and IV physical status 7. Difficult airway (Mallampati Grade III or IV)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy and safety of anaesthesia induction agent sevoflurane versus propofol for insertion of I-gel in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia.Timepoint: TIME TO INDUCTION- (Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero seconds to loss of consciousness and loss of eyelash reflex) TIME TO JAW RELAXATION â?? ( Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero seconds to relaxation of jaw required to open the mouth) TIME TO I-GEL INSERTION - (Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero seconds to successful insertion of I-gel)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We will compare the time for induction, time for jaw relaxation and time for I-gel insertion between the two groups. We will compare complications during induction and insertion of I- gel between the two groups. We will compare hemodynamic parameters of the two groups We will also compare recovery profile of the two groups. Timepoint: TIME TO INDUCTION- (Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero second to loss of consciousness and loss of eyelash reflex) TIME TO JAW RELAXATION â?? ( Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero second to relaxation of jaw required to open the mouth) TIME TO I-GEL INSERTION - (Time taken from the administration of induction agent i.e. zero second to successful insertion of I-gel)—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shilpa Bansal

Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Reaesrch

shilpa_shinde24@rediffmail.com9915433522

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026