comparision between two types of laryngeal mask airway as conduit to place breathing tube into trachea.

Comparison of success rate of BlockBusterÂ® versus FastrachÂ® LMA as conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A prospective randomised trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/10/037482

Enrollment

Registered

2021-10-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: INTUBATION USING INTUBATING LMA: Endotracheal intubation will be done using endotracheal tube via intubating LMA. Control Intervention1: COMPARISION OF INTUBATION BETWEEN FASTRACK LMA V

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing surgeries with general anaesthesia 2. Aged between 18years and 50 years of age 3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 to 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patientâ??s refusal 2.Mouth opening less than 2 cm 3.Oropharyngeal pathology 4.Morbid obesity

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
First pass successful intubation Timepoint: 5 minutes.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Ease of insertion 2.Time for insertion 3.Attempts and the success of the device placement, 4.Oropharyngeal seal pressure 5.Fibreoptic grade of laryngeal view 6.Time for removal of the device after successful tracheal intubation Timepoint: 30 minutes.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKISHORE KEERTHY N

KIMS MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE,BANGALORE

drkishorekeerthy@gmail.com9739083518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026