Skip to content

COMPARING THE CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVAâ?¢ BIOACTIVE COMPOSITE WITH NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE IN ABFRACTION LESIONS: A ONE YEAR CLINICAL STUDY

A ONE YEAR COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVAâ?¢ BIOACTIVE COMPOSITE WITH NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE IN ABFRACTION LESIONS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037401
Enrollment
34
Registered
2021-10-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: ACTIVAâ?¢ bioactive composite: Placing the restorative material on the abfraction lesions according to the manufacturers instructions after occlusal adjustments followed by recalling th

Sponsors

DR PRATHIMA B J
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who have isolated abfraction lesions with greater than 1 mm depth on the vestibular sides, associated with posterior teeth caused due to abnormal biomechanical loading forces will be selected for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Poor oral hygiene Severe or chronic periodontitis Patients with severe occlusal problems and parafunctional habits Patients with temporo mandibular joint disorders Patients who give signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis A known allergic reaction to any of the components of the materials used, Non-vital, fractured or visibly cracked tooth Cervical caries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Two blinded examiners will evaluate the restorations with a mouth mirror and probe at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year by modified USPHS criteria which involves Retention, Color Match, Marginal Discoloration, Marginal Adaptation, Secondary Caries, Surface Texture, Anatomic Form, Postoperative Sensitivity and also occlusal interferences will be evaluated using Shim Stock films. Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of both the composites using modified USPHS criteriaTimepoint: Two blinded examiners will evaluate the restorations with a mouth mirror and probe at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year by modified USPHS criteria which involves Retention, Color Match, Marginal Discoloration, Marginal Adaptation, Secondary Caries, Surface Texture, Anatomic Form, Postoperative Sensitivity and also occlusal interferences will be evaluated using Shim Stock films. Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of both the composites using modified USPHS criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients satisfaction and satisfactory clinical performance of restorative material in abfraction lesionsTimepoint: At base line 1month 6 months and 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PRATHIMA B J

K.L.E SOCIETYS INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

drkarale79@rediffmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026