FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of pain between laparoscopic and open repair of perforation peritonitis

OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN PERFORATION PERITONITIS: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037388
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-10-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K650- Generalized (acute) peritonitis

Interventions

Intervention1: LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT IN PERFORATION PERITONITIS: Perforation peritonitis patients in whom management is done via laparoscopy Control Intervention1: OPEN SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN PERFOR

Sponsors

AIIMS JODHPUR
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients (age >18 years) diagnosed as perforation peritonitis with clinical findings or supportive radiological imaging.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with perforation due to trauma. Patients with history of previous multiple midline laparotomies. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable and having septic shock. Patients with malignant perforation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgical management of perforation peritonitisTimepoint: 18 MONTHS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients with perforation due to trauma. Patients with history of previous multiple midline laparotomies. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable and having septic shock. Patients with malignant perforation. Timepoint: 18 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSHRUTI SONI

AIIMS JODHPUR

RKMOOND@GMAIL.COM8003996892

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026