Skip to content

A CLINICAL TRAIL TO STUDY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO PROCEDURES,SPINAL BLOCK AND PUDENDAL BLOCK IN HAEMORRHOIDS AND FISSURE IN ANO

A RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL OF SPINAL BLOCK VS PUDENDAL BLOCK IN HAEMORRHOIDS AND FISSURE IN ANO - RCTSPB

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037020
Enrollment
62
Registered
2021-10-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K929- Disease of digestive system, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Spinal block: patient will receive 1.5ml 0.5 percent bupivacaine after identification of anatomical space Control Intervention1: Pudendal block: 1. Patients will receive pudendal block

Sponsors

SAGAR HOSPITALS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Age: 18 years and above 2 Elective Perianal Surgeries 3 Hemorrhoids 4 Fissure in ano

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patients unwilling to participate 2 Perianal abscess/ Skin lesions â?? active infection 3 Fistula in ano 4 Coagulopathies 5 Hypersensitivity to anaesthetic agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
â?¢ To compare the analgesic effect and comfort levels of pudendal block vs spinal block in Haemorrhoids and fissure in anoTimepoint: Aug 2021- Jun 2022 after completion of study(1year) data is interpret

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess early ambulation â?¢ To assess complication profile of the surgery as well as the anaesthetic given Timepoint: Aug 2021- Jun 2022 After completion of study around 1year data is interpret.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPavankumar velagambeti

SAGAR HOSPITALS

velagambetipavan@gmail.com08790350665

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026