Skip to content

Endoscopy guided drainage of the bile duct for obstructive jaundice

EUS trans papillary or trans luminal biliary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction- a prospective randomised comparison - NA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/10/037018
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-10-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-D49- Neoplasms

Interventions

Intervention1: EUS guided stenting: Patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures requiring biliary drainage after a failed ERCP will be randomised to EUS guided AG or EUS -HGS stenting Contro

Sponsors

SL Raheja Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, distal common bile duct (CBD) cholangiocarcinoma, ampullary cancers , hilar blocks, other metastatic conditions eg LN mets, Lymphoma) • Biliary obstructive symptoms or signs • Bilirubin level/ alkaline phosphatase level above normal limits • Patients deemed as unresectable by CT / MRI / PET • Patients with failed ERCP or anticipated difficult ERCP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Biliary strictures caused by confirmed benign tumours • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for current malignancy • Palliative indication due to reasons other than surgical candidate status • Previous biliary drainage by ERCP/PTC • Patients for whom endoscopic techniques are contraindicated • Participation in another investigational trial within 180 days • Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We hypothesize that the stent patency via trans-luminal route is better than that via trans-papillary route. The primary aim of the study is to compare the stent patency in patients undergoing EUS guided antegrade procedure and EUS-guided HGS. Timepoint: 3, 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary aim is to compare the short and long term adverse events of the two proceduresTimepoint: 3, 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rahul Shah

SL Raheja Hospital

rahulhshah@hotmail.com9820190508

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026