Skip to content

Comparison of efficacy and safety of long-acting filgrastim versus conventional filgrastim in children with cancer

Long-acting filgrastim versus conventional filgrastim as primary prophylaxis following pediatric dose-intensive chemotherapy: a randomized superiority trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/037016
Enrollment
636
Registered
2021-09-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C819- Hodgkin lymphoma, unspecified Health Condition 2: C499- Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, unspecified Health Condition 3: C649- Malignant neoplasm of unspecifiedkidney, except renal pelvis Health Condition 4: C858- Other specified types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Interventions

Intervention1: Pegfilgrastim: Long acting granulocyte stimulating factor administered as a single dose Control Intervention1: Conventional filgrastim: Administer as daily 100 microgram/kg injections t

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 1. Receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy (expected incidence of FN without growth factor >20%) and qualifying for standard indication of growth factor support. 2. Receiving growth-factor in view of interval-compression of chemotherapy showing significant benefit in terms of patient outcome 3. Receiving growth-factor as a part of standard chemotherapy protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Prior radiation therapy within 4 weeks of randomization 2. Marrow involvement by tumor 3. Prior bone marrow or stem-cell transplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine whether single dose of long acting pegylated filgrastim is superior to conventional filgrastim in terms of incidence of febrile neutropeniaTimepoint: 2 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare between the two groups: 1. Duration of neutrophil recovery 2. Depth of absolute neutrophil count nadir 3. Chemotherapy cycle duration 4. Incidence of mucositis 5. Number of transfusions 6. Incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse event to drug 7. Magnitude of CD34 stem cell mobilization Timepoint: 2 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jagdish Prasad Meena

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

drjpmeena@gmail.com8890139358

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026