Skip to content

Space closure in orthodontics using miniscrews

Comparative Evaluation of miniscrew assisted rate of enmasse retraction using piezoincision induced and conventional retraction- A clinical Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036942
Enrollment
10
Registered
2021-09-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures Health Condition 2: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Enmasse retraction using piezoincision induced retraction : Piezocision was performed after the completion of leveling and aligning. A small vertical incision was made using No:15 BP bl

Sponsors

Nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Angles class I malocclusion indicated for bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction 2.No clinical signs of periodontal issues 3. No gingivitis or untreated caries 4. No history of periodontal therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Cases in which Functional appliances, growth modification involved in treatment. 2.Orthognathic surgery was involved in treatment. 3.Patients with Periodontally compromised dentition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
COMPARITIVE EVALUATION BEFORE AND AFTER ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTTimepoint: 3 MONTHS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
COMPARITIVE EVALUATION BEFORE AND AFTER ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTTimepoint: 3 WEEKS

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR GOUTHAM B

COORG INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

drgouthamreddy2000@gmail.com9900620536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026