FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between two groups of drugs used for Peritubal infiltration between Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine with clonidine in PCNL patients

Peritubal infiltration of Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine with Clonidine for postoperative analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - A double blind randomized comparative study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036925
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-09-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N200- Calculus of kidney

Interventions

Control Intervention1: BUPIVACAINE VS BUPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE GIVEN ALONG THE NEPHROSTOMY TUBE IN PCNL PATIENTS: Balanced general anaesthesia will be administered, induction will be done using Fent

Sponsors

MAHATMA GANDHI HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency surgeries Patients having supracostal puncture Excessive bleeding intraoperatively More than one puncture Cardiac and respiratory diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIATimepoint: At the time of extubation,half hourly for 2 h, every 2 hourly for the next 6 h and every 4 hourly until 24 h.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
RESCUE ANALGESIATimepoint: 0, 30 MINUTES, 60 MINUTES, 90 MINUTES, 2 HOURS, 4 HOURS, 6 HOURS, 8 HOURS, 16 HOURS, 24 HOURS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRICHA GARG

MAHATAMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH HEALTH CENTER

doc.richa11@gmail.com9780499772

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026