FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of 2 laryngoscope for intubation.

Comparison of King Vision video laryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope for routine airway management.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036642
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-09-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Government medical college new civil hospital surat
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a)Patients posted for planned surgery in general anesthesia b)Patients belonging to ASA grade 1,2or3 c)Patients in between the age group of 18-60 years d)Patients who are giving written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a)History of difficult intubation or anticipated airway difficulties b)Any pathology of oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device c)Mouth opening d)Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, H/o gastric regurgitation e)Severe Cardio-respiratory or hepato-renal dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
a.Ease of intubation with reference to: â?¢Total time of intubation â?¢Intubation Difficulty scaleTimepoint: Maximum 24 hours.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a)Haemodynamics parameters b)Cormack-Lehane scoreTimepoint: Minimum 24 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bansari N Kantharia

Government medical college, Surat, Gujarat

bansarikantharia@gmail.com9825690177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026