FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluation of minimal flow rate of anesthesia gases during general Anesthesia in children

Minimal flow anaesthesia: Comparative evaluation of i-gelTM vs endotracheal tube in children - a randomised controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036638
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-09-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Conduct of minimal flows anesthesia: use of minimal flow rate for general anesthesia will be practised in both groups Control Intervention1: Tracheal tube: Flow rate of equal to or less

Sponsors

Madhukar Rainbow Childrens hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I and II those scheduled for elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Post-conception Age Weight Anticipated difficult airway Obesity with BMI > 30 Kg/m2 Emergency surgery Anaesthesia duration Laparoscopic surgery Prone position Oral surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients in which minimal flows could be used and flows had to be increasedTimepoint: 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
any adverse effect because of lower flowsTimepoint: 15 min,30 min after extubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRakhee Goyal

Madhukar Rainbow Childrenâ??s Hospital Delhi

pedanes.mndel@rainbowhospitals.in7798225637

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026