FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative evaluation of McGrath and C-MAC videolaryngoscope on intubation performance in infants

Comparative evaluation of McGrath and C-MAC video laryngoscopes intubation performance for training a novice in a COVID simulating infant mannequin using protective face equipment-A randomized crossover trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036484
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-09-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparitive evaluation of McGrath videolaryngoscope intubation performance with C-MAC videolaryngoscope: One month Control Intervention1: Participants will use C-MAC videolaryngoscop

Sponsors

DrRidhima Sharma
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Doctors and Paramedical staff from a multidisciplinary team working in a tertiary care super speciality Paediatric centre converted into a COVID care centre. 2.No experience on any of the video laryngoscope

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Previous experience of intubating in a similar setting (i.e. with video laryngoscope within an intubation box 2.Refuse to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Primary endpoint of this study is to compare the time to intubation between the two groups. Group 1 McGrath and Group 2; C-MACTimepoint: One month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare parameters- Cormack-Lehane grading, Percentage of Glottic opening, Failed intubation, First attempt success rate and Ease of intubation by the user.Timepoint: one month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRidhima Sharma

Post Graduate Institute of Child health Noida

drridhimasharma@yahoo.com08054549458

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026