TO COMPARE BETWEEN THREE INSTRUMENTS USED TO VISUALIZE VOCAL CORDS

Comparison of ease of intubation with airtraq, miller, and macintosh laryngoscope blades in children- a prospepective randomised trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/09/036334

Enrollment

Registered

2021-09-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 3: J330- Polyp of nasal cavity Health Condition 4: J330- Polyp of nasal cavity Health Condition 5: J330- Polyp of nasal cavity Health Condition 6: J330- Polyp of nasal cavity

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparing ease of intubation in 3 groups. Patients intubated with airtraq ,Miller, macintosh: Size of the Laryngoscope is based on the age and weight of the child

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 and 2 weight of 10 â?? 35 kg Adequate mouth opening Various elective surgerical procedures under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with active upper / lower respiratory tract infections Risk of aspiration Severe systemic disease Anticipated difficult airway Potiential and actual cervical spine injury Laryngeal trauma Hypoxia Coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Ease of intubation ï?·Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS), ï?·Cormackâ??Lehane grade and Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) Haemodynamic responseTimepoint: Preinduction, Postintubation 0min, 1 min, 3 min, 5 min	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Heamodynamic responseTimepoint: 0 min, 3 min, 5 min	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMADHURI KURDI

KARNATAKA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

arunima.kg@gmail.com8147112765

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026